I think you're muddling dynamic and dimensioned arrays - a dynamic array can't have an element 0 :-)
Sounds like somebody, when writing jBase, saw the "feature" of <-1> and thought they'd be clever with <0>. Cheers, Wol -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid Sent: 19 August 2008 14:53 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [U2] Dynamic Array oddity very useful That is then flavour dependent - in information flavour there is a zero element , that's where the overflowing elements go ( if any) in a matparse. -- mats Martin Phillips skrev: > Hi Dennis, > >> So A<0> = X is a way quicker way of writing A = X : @fm : A > > I'm not sure that this is a safe assumption. I have taken a quick look > at the documentation for various mv products and they tend not to > define what will happen. > > Trying your example with UV does not produce the result that you quote. > > I think that the real issue here is that there is no field zero. It is > up to the different products to determine what they do in this case as > there doesn't appear to be an agreed behaviour. ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
