My thoughts exactly. We have a perfectly good database here, why not use
it. Storing data in a dictionary has always been a bad idea, even the
ubiquitous "next.available" record key.
David A. Green wrote:
All this talk about using the Dictionary item to store extra data has
prompted this post.
I realize in the past when the limit to the number of Opened Files in a
Basic program was a programming challenge, that doing creative data storage
might have been an necessity. But I would like to suggest we leave the
Dictionary alone, let the database use it the way it wants to and let us
create our own storage device for dictionary related data.
Thoughts?
David A. Green
(480) 813-1725
DAG Consulting
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Schasny - Denver, Co, USA
jschasny at gmail dot com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
