Not millions: 1102 needed to be hand-done; took about 2 weeks.  Now
changing programs which generate dictionaries.  Grrrr

On 24 January 2011 21:02, Symeon Breen <syme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Weeks ? – you must have millions of them ;)
>
>
>
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
> Sent: 24 January 2011 04:23
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] 3.99 x 3 = 11
>
>
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Yes, I do realise we could change our system to use only I-type dicts,
> with F1 value 1 for some data, value 2 for another, etc, etc.  Pretty
> untidy.  As you say, it would be a huge job.
>
> We still could not assign a field to use for stamps, complying with
> the rest of the system.
>
> We now list and inquire on dictionaries through programs which present
> them all in the same format.
>
> We are in the process of changing all dictionary items which calculate
> on quantity to I-types.  Annoying, but achievable in weeks, rather
> than months.
>
> Thanks, Kate
>
> On 24 January 2011 15:42, Dan McGrath <dmc...@imb.com.au> wrote:
>> Hi Kate,
>>
>> You can use multivalue and sub-multivalue marks can be used to keep it
> just as organised.
>>
>> :ED....
>> :P
>> 001: DýMANDýENUM CLASSES
>> 002: 10
>> 003:
>> 004:
>> 005: 10L
>> 006: M
>>
>> :EV
>> :P
>> 001: D
>> 002: MAND
>> 003: ENUM CLASSES
>>
>>
>> We normally just use LISTDICT (an inbuilt paragraph) to display dictionary
> items
>>
>>
>> :LISTDICT ourfile
>> SORT DICT ourfile TYP LOC CONV MNAME FORMAT SM ASSOC BY TYP BY LOC BY @I
>> D 13:38:56 24 JAN 2011 1
>> @ID............ TYP LOC.......... CONV MNAME.......... FORMAT SM
> ASSOC.....
>> CLASS           D              10                      10L    M
>>
>>
>> I can appreciate that it can be an enormous task to change an existing
> system though.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
>> Sent: Monday, 24 January 2011 12:19 PM
>> To: U2 Users List
>> Subject: Re: [U2] 3.99 x 3 = 11
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion.
>>
>> Yes, we use that space for the short description of the data.
>>
>> It would be very messy to try to use this additionally for:
>> -  before cell, after cell processing flags
>> -  minimum characters
>> -  store data field no
>> -  data required flag
>> -  display-only flag
>> -  max no of sets (assuming use F7 to define set this data belongs to, and
> that item for each item in the set with different type)
>> -  match patterns list
>> -  delimiter and sub-field no, if applicable
>> -  sundry code ID for validation
>> -  prompt ID for search
>> -  update stamps list (same format as other files: each with date, time,
> function, who)
>>
>> Especially when it all works appended to A and S type dicts - would take
> weeks or months to change!
>>
>> What happens on UniData if you ED and P, or print an I-type dict item?
>>  Do you stay viable?
>>
>> Cheers, Kate
>>
>> On 21 January 2011 18:06, Dan McGrath <dmc...@imb.com.au> wrote:
>>> With I-types, are you aware you can store whatever you want in Attribute
> 1 after the data type?
>>>
>>> This is where we store any additional information required as such  data
> integrity checks, date last changed, etc.
>>>
>>> Log out issues with dictionary compilation must be specific to UniVerse
> (?) as we do not have that issue in UniData.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
>>> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate
>>> Stanton
>>> Sent: Friday, 21 January 2011 3:46 PM
>>> To: U2 Users List
>>> Subject: [U2] 3.99 x 3 = 11
>>>
>>> Does anyone else have a problem with this?
>>>
>>> We have (for about 30 years) allowed users to use a decimal point when
> entering quantity.
>>>
>>> In the dim dark past (was it under Prime or Ultimate? don't remember) we
> discovered that correlatives ignored anything after a decimal point, so
> wrote horrible correlatives multiplying the bit before the point by 10000,
> appending 0000 to the bit after, taking the first 4 chars of this and adding
> it, doing arithmetic then dividing result by 10000.
>>>
>>> In the slightly less dim dark past (before 1997, when we introduced our
> current change control system), we noticed that this problem had been fixed,
> and removed the complication from correlatives involving quantity.
>>>
>>> Now, many years and much development later, we extensively use
>>> dictionary output rather than programs for reports, forms (eg
>>> invoices) and queries.
>>>
>>> Inaccurate data is an unexpected result.  On type S (or A) dictionaries,
> result of calculation in A or F correlatives is truncated to the decimal
> point (eg 3.99 x 3 = 11). Minor result is incorrect figures.  Major result
> is under-reporting of totals which are not able to be reconciled to General
> Ledger (eg value of stock on hand).
>>>
>>> Rocket's response is that the manual says correlatives only do integer
> arithmetic.  This is not quite true, as integer 3.99 x 3 would be 9.
>>>
>>> I-type dictionary items handle the data correctly (3.99 x 3 = 11.97).
>>>
>>> I-types have their own problems, in that fields after 10 are used for
> internal purposes, so are not able to carry extra information needed for
> data entry (such as data required, display only, validation rules, data
> change stamp, etc.
>>>
>>> I-types also are hard to work with as using a changed dictionary without
> compiling the dictionary logs the user out, and inadvertent attempt to
> display data in fields beyond F10 can lock user up, as well as untidily
> logging out.
>>>
>>> We are asking Rocket to consider this a bug.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> TIA, Kate
>>>
>>> Kate Stanton
>>> Walstan Systems Ltd
>>> 4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
>>> Phone: + 64 9 360 5310  Mobile: + 64 21 400 486
>>> Email: k...@walstan.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> U2-Users mailing list
>>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> ######################################################################
>>> ##################### The information transmitted in this message and
>>> attachments (if any) is intended only for the person or entity to
>>> which it is addressed. The message may contain confidential and/or
>>> privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
>>> other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information
>>> by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
>>> prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
> delete the material from any computer.
>>>
>>> The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce,
>>> disclose or distribute the information contained in this e-mail and any
> attached files with the permission of IMB.
>>> ######################################################################
>>> ##################### _______________________________________________
>>> U2-Users mailing list
>>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kate Stanton
>> Walstan Systems Ltd
>> 4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
>> Phone: + 64 9 360 5310  Mobile: + 64 21 400 486
>> Email: k...@walstan.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
>> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>>
> ############################################################################
> ###############
>> The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is
> intended only
>> for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain
> confidential
>> and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
> other use of
>> or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
> entities other
>> than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error,
> please
>> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>>
>> The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or
> distribute
>> the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the
> permission of IMB.
>>
> ############################################################################
> ###############
>> _______________________________________________
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kate Stanton
> Walstan Systems Ltd
> 4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
> Phone: + 64 9 360 5310  Mobile: + 64 21 400 486
> Email: k...@walstan.com
> _______________________________________________
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
>  _____
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3398 - Release Date: 01/23/11
>
> _______________________________________________
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>



-- 
Kate Stanton
Walstan Systems Ltd
4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
Phone: + 64 9 360 5310  Mobile: + 64 21 400 486
Email: k...@walstan.com
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to