As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of funky things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. Completing the project SHOULD be quicker and thus cheaper. Maintenance would also be quicker and cheaper.
But that is just the 10,000 foot view/opinion. John Israel Senior Programmer/Analyst Dayton Superior Corporation 1125 Byers Road Miamisburg, OHÂ 45342 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:47 AM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. Thanks Symeon. _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
