On 27/05/11 16:53, Israel, John R. wrote: > As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of funky > things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. Completing the > project SHOULD be quicker and thus cheaper. Maintenance would also be > quicker and cheaper. > > But that is just the 10,000 foot view/opinion.
Actually, providing the underlying architecture is unchanged, completing the project should be very quick by sticking with UV. Can you get hold of a temporary licence? Assuming it's on x86, copying accounts between widely different systems is a doddle (I've done it between SCO, linux and Windows), and I'd guess it's the same for others. Even if you're going from an old SCO system to a new 2008 system, I'd be inclined as a first attempt to copy the IBM directory and the account across, "re-install" UV over the old system, and see if it works. There's a good chance it will ... Are you in the uk? Contact me off-line and we can discuss it... Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
