On 12/09/11 21:39, John Thompson wrote:
> The @1<1,1,1> worked.
> Weird...  So the output is not the same as whats in the data?

There's a good reason for that ...

You can pass a multi-value list of id's to look up (or something like
that). If it then returned several multi-valued results, separated by
value marks, you'd have no way of knowing what came from where.

That's the point behind my other comment over PI - that tried to be
intelligent about whether a lower was or wasn't needed. And all it did
was confuse. Because UV *always* lowers, it's much simpler.
> Be nice of them to document that :)

Isn't it? Probably not where you can easily find it, though :-)

U2-Users mailing list

Reply via email to