Oops I need to modify my message about these zombie tl_server.exe Windows sessions.
The server is running Universe on Windows, and our users *should* be running AccuTerm However there is no requirement to run Accuterm as, as I understand it, the tl_service.exe will respond to any request for a telnet session to be opened. Doesn't have to be Accuterm. Doesn't have to be a human. I'm suspicious that there isn't some *other* type of requestor out there somewhere, trying to open a session and then leaving it hang. That could explain the failure to log in if this "other" something isn't even a human operator, but some kind of automated something. I had hoped I could get come kind of clue by looking at *when* these things are occurring and so Windows Process Explorer was loaded, which at least will tell us the *time* each process was created. But the times seem kinda random, one even occurring at 2 AM (!) -----Original Message----- From: Wjhonson <wjhon...@aol.com> To: u2-users <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> Sent: Sat, Sep 8, 2012 8:57 am Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows] Universe on Windows / with Accuterm -----Original Message----- From: John Jenkins <u2g...@btinternet.com> To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> Cc: u2-users <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> Sent: Sat, Sep 8, 2012 7:28 am Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows] I suspect the database does not have device licensing. Check with confprod or unregen -z. The shell used (on unix) would be either uvdls or udtts. The client software would need to support it as well. wIntegrate, Dynamic Connect or SBClient usually. Regards JayJay Sent from my iPad On 7 Sep 2012, at 17:57, Wjhonson <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: > > This system entry is empty. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Jenkins <u2g...@btinternet.com> > To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> > Cc: u2-users <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> > Sent: Fri, Sep 7, 2012 9:54 am > Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows] > > > If you are using device licensing, SYSTEM(51) has some useful information. > > Regards. JayJay > > > Sent from my iPad > > On 7 Sep 2012, at 14:59, Wjhonson <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: > >> The -o as I reported earlier only links it to the "instantiating" pid which is > of course, much to my dismay, just the tl_service.exe not the actual pid of the > tl_server.exe job. >> >> So every telnet session, on the -o reports the *same* pid. >> But in the tasklist of course they each have different pids. >> So this doesn't solve the issue either. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian Leach <br...@brianleach.co.uk> >> To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> >> Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 7:06 pm >> Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows] >> >> >> and -o to let you link it with the pid. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 6 Sep 2012, at 21:04, Robert Houben <robert.hou...@fwic.net> wrote: >> >>> On Windows 7, netstat -help shows this: >>> -f Displays Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDN) for foreign >>> addresses. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org >>> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] > >> On Behalf Of Wjhonson >>> Sent: September-06-12 1:01 PM >>> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >>> Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows] >>> >>> >>> There is no -f option on netstat >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Jeff Schasny <jscha...@gmail.com> >>> To: U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> >>> Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 12:15 pm >>> Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows] >>> >>> >>> netstat -f >>> >>> Wjhonson wrote: >>>> When a remote PC, asks the Windows server to open a Telnet session, >>>> Windows >>> assigns a Process ID to that request. While the telnet session is >>> open,that >> Process ID will appear in the Windows Task Manager. >>>> >>>> Is there a way to tell, WHO ask for that Telnet session to be opened? >>>> That >>> is, the name of the remote PC, Foreign Address, Mac Address, IP or >>> something >> of that sort that identifies the requestor/asker ? >>>> >>>> This has to be done *outside of* Universe, not inside it, for a >>>> particular >>> reason. >>>> >>>> Anyone know the answer? >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> U2-Users mailing list >>>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org >>>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Jeff Schasny - Denver, Co, USA >>> jschasny at gmail dot com >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> U2-Users mailing list >>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org >>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> U2-Users mailing list >>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org >>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> U2-Users mailing list >>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org >>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >> _______________________________________________ >> U2-Users mailing list >> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org >> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> U2-Users mailing list >> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org >> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
