Dynamic files are no help in your situation, they are 2GB or 64-bit just
like hashed files.
You need either 64-bit or a DISTRIBUTED file.  [I think this kind of file is
called 'dynamic' in UniData, just to make things confusing!].  A distributed
file divides the data into several portions based on the record-ID.
There have been several discussions of UniVerse Distributed files on the
list in the past year or so, check the archives.


HTH


Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 30 January 2004 8:28 a.m.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [UV] Resize - Dynamic or 64 bit?
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> UV 9.6 / HPUX 11
> 
> I have a hashed file approaching the 2 gig limit.  I need 
> some help determining whether to go with the dynamic or 64 bit option.
> 
> Here are some specifics.
> 
> The file is our inventory history file which is, as you can 
> imagine, used heavily.  Approximately 85 percent of the 
> records are 4k in size.
> 
> I have always frowned upon using dynamic files because they 
> seem to be slower compared to hashed.  Maybe because I have 
> never attempted to figure out how to tune them.
> 
> Can anyone give me the pros/cons of using the 64 bit versus 
> dynamic option?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> u2-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
> 

The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or 
distribute this message or the information in it.

If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
_______________________________________________
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to