Simon, I know of at least one site running over 500 users on a W2K box, though I tend to think this is exceptionally high. Given the architecture and limitations of Windows, making any assurance for scalability inside the box WITHOUT TESTING is difficult when you get above 300 users.
Tom Firl Columbia Ultimate > -----Original Message----- > From: Kirkham, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:49 AM > To: U2 Users Discussion List > Subject: RE: UniVerse on NT vs *nix - Higher User Counts with W2003? > > > Now I'm worried... > > We've got a 300 user enterprise installation runnning on > win2k (enterprise), and the user count regularly goes well > over 300 (388 right now). What symptoms of hitting the around > 300 user ceiling might I see? > > For info, hardware is an 8xcpu dell box, 2Gb ram, 80gb > external raid box. Users are mostly uniobject & telnet > clients, no significant batch jobs during main office hours. > Performance is no problem (except when a redback process goes > nuts, but thats another story). > > Simon > > Simon Kirkham > IS Manager > Taunton Deane B.C. > Tel 01823 356396 > Fax 01823 356329 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Stephen O'Neal > Sent: 09 March 2004 09:16 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: UniVerse on NT vs *nix - Higher User Counts with W2003? > > > > > > > > Yes, currently, most W2000 installations max out at about 300 users. > > We may be at a point of transition. The old ceiling of > around 300 users on > W2000 may increase to a higher threshold with W2003. > > Initial tests (although limited) on W2003 point to some of > the inherent > bottlenecks may be removed that were in W2000. > > We have not performed any formal benchmarks (nor do we have > any scheduled > soon) to attempt to scale a W2003 system to maximum user load with an > application. > > (Humor here...) Given the huge sucking sound that comes from > the black hole > in the "UniVerse" called Microsoft, I believe there will be > someone out > there that will upgrade from W2000 to W2003. They may observe more > scalability of their applications as we have in our limited > testing. This > may be the first place where we observe the user counts going > up on W2003 > systems. > > Has anyone performed an upgrade from W2000 to W2003 and > gotten more users > on their system? (Quantify if possible.) > > Curious, > Steve > > Stephen M. O'Neal, CDP > IBM Data Management Solutions > U2 Professional Services, Special Projects) > > > > > > > "Ken Wallis" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'U2 > Users Discussion List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > st.com> cc: > > > Sent by: Subject: RE: > UniVerse on NT vs *nix > > u2-users-bounces@ > > > oliver.com > > > > > > > > > 03/08/2004 06:42 > > > PM > > > Please respond to > > > U2 Users > > > Discussion List > > > > > > > > > > Sara Burns wrote: > > >I am under considerable pressure to convert from UniVerse on > >AIX to UniVerse on Windows 2003. > > > >We have licenses for 320 users and do get up to this number at times > >although 300 is more normal. > > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE. > This communication is intended solely for the person (s) or > organisation to whom > it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential > information and if > you are not the intended recipient (s), you must not copy, > distribute or take > any action in reliance on it. If you have received this > e-mail in error please > notify the sender and copy the message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users