MvBase? I think he was saying "best provider for MV" not for MvBase.... Right? And I didn't say it, he did. Will "the real Will not the fake posing Will's" Johnson
In a message dated 3/29/2004 3:09:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Will, > > Unless something has changed since Friday, Raining Data's .NET provider does > not connect to mvBase. > > There are only 10 people in the world who understand binary and I am not one > of them. > George Smith > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 1:57 PM > > To: U2 Users Discussion List > > Subject: Re: Question for Donald Kibbey > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2004 2:28:38 PM Eastern Standard > > Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > George, the best commercial integration option > available > > for MV right > > > now is the Pick Data Provider .NET from Raining Data. > > > > But doesn't .NET take up like a gazillion bytes of space? > > And doesn't "integration" require an object? > > As in... integration with .. what? > > Will -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
