There's no way around that - each new version will just need to be uploaded to AMO when its released.
- Blair On 9/11/2008 10:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Atul, > > Yes, it does. How do we tackle this? > > Also, separating this conversation into it's own thread. > > - Mayuresh > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Atul Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > That would be great, mskadu. Only thing that might interfere with > this is the fact that Ubiquity's install.rdf currently points at > ubiquity.mozilla.com <http://ubiquity.mozilla.com> for updates; I > assume that AMO would change this. > > Go ahead and upload 0.1.2 and let us know how it goes! > > - Atul > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:23 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I'd be happy to help with this. All it needs is the last XPI and > an icon. So to begin with, here's what we can expect: > > (extract) > > /Thanks for your interest in submitting your add-on to Mozilla > Add-ons. Hosting your add-on on Mozilla Add-ons is the easiest > way to handle distribution of your add-on. Here's what you'll get:/ > > * /Each add-on will have a public display page with > information you provide, such as a brief summary of the > add-on's functionality, an optional longer description, > and a showcase of preview screenshots of your add-on./ > * /Your add-on will appear in search and browse listings > across the site, and even in the Add-ons Manager of > Firefox 3./ > * /We'll take care of hosting all of your downloads and > providing automatic updates to users when you upload a new > version./ > * /You'll have access to a statistics dashboard with > detailed information about your user base./ > > /Add-ons hosted on the site must be reviewed by a Mozilla > Add-ons Editor before they will have all of the features listed > above./ > > (extract ends) > > So do I just simply upload v0.1.2? > > -- > Mayuresh > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Atul Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Thanks Gary! > > mskadu, there's an item on the Roadmap Proposals wiki page > under "Stabilization of Current Feature Set" for getting > Ubiquity on AMO as a non-experimental addon. That's a good > point about at least getting it into the experimental > sandbox though, if we put it on there with the stated > intention that it shouldn't be let out of the sandbox > because of known security issues. Does anyone want to look > into doing this? > > - Atul > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Just curious as to (still) why there are no plans to > make Ubiquity available on FF addons site - > addons.mozilla.org <http://addons.mozilla.org> (even if > as a experimental addon)? > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
