I thought as much. I am going to remove the updateURL for now and re-try submitting.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Blair McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's no way around that - each new version will just need to be > uploaded to AMO when its released. > > - Blair > > > > > > On 9/11/2008 10:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Atul, > > > > Yes, it does. How do we tackle this? > > > > Also, separating this conversation into it's own thread. > > > > - Mayuresh > > > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Atul Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > That would be great, mskadu. Only thing that might interfere with > > this is the fact that Ubiquity's install.rdf currently points at > > ubiquity.mozilla.com <http://ubiquity.mozilla.com> for updates; I > > assume that AMO would change this. > > > > Go ahead and upload 0.1.2 and let us know how it goes! > > > > - Atul > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:23 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > I'd be happy to help with this. All it needs is the last XPI and > > an icon. So to begin with, here's what we can expect: > > > > (extract) > > > > /Thanks for your interest in submitting your add-on to Mozilla > > Add-ons. Hosting your add-on on Mozilla Add-ons is the easiest > > way to handle distribution of your add-on. Here's what you'll > get:/ > > > > * /Each add-on will have a public display page with > > information you provide, such as a brief summary of the > > add-on's functionality, an optional longer description, > > and a showcase of preview screenshots of your add-on./ > > * /Your add-on will appear in search and browse listings > > across the site, and even in the Add-ons Manager of > > Firefox 3./ > > * /We'll take care of hosting all of your downloads and > > providing automatic updates to users when you upload a new > > version./ > > * /You'll have access to a statistics dashboard with > > detailed information about your user base./ > > > > /Add-ons hosted on the site must be reviewed by a Mozilla > > Add-ons Editor before they will have all of the features listed > > above./ > > > > (extract ends) > > > > So do I just simply upload v0.1.2? > > > > -- > > Mayuresh > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Atul Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Thanks Gary! > > > > mskadu, there's an item on the Roadmap Proposals wiki page > > under "Stabilization of Current Feature Set" for getting > > Ubiquity on AMO as a non-experimental addon. That's a good > > point about at least getting it into the experimental > > sandbox though, if we put it on there with the stated > > intention that it shouldn't be let out of the sandbox > > because of known security issues. Does anyone want to look > > into doing this? > > > > - Atul > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Just curious as to (still) why there are no plans to > > make Ubiquity available on FF addons site - > > addons.mozilla.org <http://addons.mozilla.org> (even if > > as a experimental addon)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Mayuresh --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
