The present weather command does not show previews? It does for me.

- Abi

2008/11/9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Right, that was me being a thick-head and not packaging properly. The
> Ubiquity add-on is now online at:
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/9527/
>
> Note that, since the addon is marked experimental AMO will not provide
> updates through update checker service (further thoughts on this?)
>
> For the moment, I have added Atul and Fernando as owners so that you guys
> can make any additional changes yourself. For some reason, it would let me
> add Aza's email id (something about "account not being present").
>
> We now need help with
>
>    - Better descriptions (maybe to contain links to Herd)
>    - More + better + recent screenshots (for instance, in the present ver.
>    weather command does not show preview, the command listing screenshot is
>    still old and so on)
>    - User reviews
>    - Point Ubiquity pages to the AMO page.
>    - any other suggestions
>
> Also, in order for the upload to be completed. I needed to make the
> following change to install.rdf
>
> <em:maxVersion>*3.1b2pre*</em:maxVersion>
>
> The earlier value of 3.1.* was not acceptable. Apparently the only
> acceptable values are at:
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/appversions
>
> - Mayuresh
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:08 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Weird. Now it says "install.rdf" is not present. Here's the actual
>> message:
>> *Oops! There seems to be a problem with this file...*
>>
>> *No install.rdf present.
>> Please see this 
>> page<https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/appversions>for 
>> reference.
>> *
>>
>> *Please correct this problem and upload your file again.*
>>
>>
>> I don't think this has anything to do with removing the updateURL, because
>> the MDC docs[1] specifically say:
>>
>> *Alternatively, you could host your extension on 
>> AMO<http://addons.mozilla.org/>and leave out the
>> updateURL completely. This provides secure updates automatically.*
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Install_Manifests
>>
>> - Mayuresh
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I thought as much. I am going to remove the updateURL for now and re-try
>>> submitting.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Blair McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> There's no way around that - each new version will just need to be
>>>> uploaded to AMO when its released.
>>>>
>>>> - Blair
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/11/2008 10:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>> > Atul,
>>>> >
>>>> > Yes, it does. How do we tackle this?
>>>> >
>>>> > Also, separating this conversation into it's own thread.
>>>> >
>>>> > - Mayuresh
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Atul Varma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     That would be great, mskadu. Only thing that might interfere with
>>>> >     this is the fact that Ubiquity's install.rdf currently points at
>>>> >     ubiquity.mozilla.com <http://ubiquity.mozilla.com> for updates; I
>>>> >     assume that AMO would change this.
>>>> >
>>>> >     Go ahead and upload 0.1.2 and let us know how it goes!
>>>> >
>>>> >     - Atul
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ubiquity-firefox" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to