Hi all, I'm glad we're talking about these "complex commands"... David's point about the comma is good, but I think we'll need to look a little more carefully at how to best express (or how to best compromise on) these types of constructions with different languages as we go forward. In the mean time, a beta with either the "and" or "," would be cool to play with, though. ^^
mitcho On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:31 PM, David Duymelinck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm late at the party but why not use a comma instead of and? It's not a > 100% natural language construction but it will give you less trouble > when the commands get internationalized and for ubiquity users it's more > visible how many commands are being used. for example: short this with > tinyurl, post it on twitter. Or even better IMO: tinyurl selection, to > twitter. I find this too generic, this can be everything and nothing but > that is an other discussion. > > David > > > Op 5/02/2009 18:11, Fernando Takai schreef: > > Piping commands is a priority (at least for me) - and it's on our > > roadmap - but, unfortunately, is not an easy thing to do. > > I think would be good to write, for example: short this with tinyurl > > and post it on twitter. > > > > Take a look at https://ubiquity.mozilla.com/trac/ticket/255 > > > > > -- mitcho (Michael 芳貴 Erlewine) [email protected] Linguist, coder, and teacher --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ubiquity-firefox" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
