I'm pretty sure that Google not being suggested is because of the case-
sensitivity bug.  (See 
http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox/browse_thread/thread/489b382eb420a265
)
We have a fix for this bug already, and it will be included in the
final version of 0.5 to be released this week, so "g" or "go" will
once again complete to "google".

Timur, your suggestion about Ctrl-N and Ctrl-P is very interesting.
You must be an Emacs user, right?  I am to, and I often find myself
trying to use ctrl-N and ctrl-P in other applications... I think we
could consider adding those as an equivalent to the up-arrow /down-
arrow keys; it would be a benefit for Emacs users and it wouldn't hurt
anybody else.

But back to the main question: there are definitely a few questionable
rankings making it in to the suggestion list with the new parser.  We
may have to tweak some of the weights of the various factors that go
into sorting the suggestion list.  We should start a conversation
about that over on [email protected].

--Jono

On Jun 28, 9:54 am, palousegeo <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've found the same situation on WinXP. I've had a bit more luck using
> "s" (for search), but I miss doing "g tab" search term. When I tried
> "Google", search wasn't even one of the options.
>
> -Rick
>
> On Jun 26, 11:48 pm, Timur Izhbulatov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > 2009/6/27 Brandon Pung <[email protected]>:
>
> > > So it sounds like there are two things you were asking about here. First 
> > > is
> > > that "goo" is returning "add to google calender" as the top suggestion
> > > instead of the verb "Google (search term)", when you would expect "Google
> > > (search term)" to be the top choice. Your second concern is that you can't
> > > tab to cycle through the suggestions.
>
> > > For your first thing: I agree that "go" should have "Google (search term)"
> > > as the top suggestion. It seems to be a problem with case sensitivity. If
> > > you type "Go" then "Google (search term)" will be the top suggestion (at
> > > least it is for me). In fact, even just "G" is giving "Google" as the top
> > > choice, which is good. So we should make sure our matching to verbs is not
> > > being done with case senstivity, because I don't think it should care 
> > > about
> > > the case of the letters here. Good catch!
>
> > Hm... I have "google" in the suggestions, not "Google".
>
> > Unfortunately, now I can't reproduce my issue with calendar reliably.
> > However, there are some things that I noticed:
> >   * the problem appeared right after update
> >   * there was only one browser window with many tabs
> >   * there problem disappeared in new window
>
> > I also tried unsubscribe/subscribe on the calendar command feed and
> > restarting the browser, but it didn't help to reproduce the problem.
>
> > > For the second thing: We want to keep the behavior of tabs doing tab
> > > completion, instead of cycling through suggestions. Arrow keys seems like 
> > > an
> > > intuitive way to go up and down between the different suggestions when the
> > > tab key is being used for auto-complete. If that doesn't sound right we're
> > > open to ideas.
>
> > Thanks for the explanation. Now I agree that tab completion and
> > choosing from suggestions are different actions. I never had to cycle
> > through suggestions before I stumbled upon this issue. The problem was
> > that I got stuck at the top choice and completion didn't help to get
> > out, plus, the list of suggestions was rather odd. However, I
> > personally would prefer Ctrl+N/Ctrl+P instead of arrow keys.
>
> > So, I think the main issue is the list of suggestions, which seems
> > rather confusing sometimes. For instance, when I type 'g', the 'get
> > weather' is the top suggestion and Tab does not change anything, so
> > that I have only what I already typed in the command line. But when I
> > type 'ge', 'search with Ubuntu Package Search' (one of my search
> > engines) is on the top and Tab changes my 'ge' to 'Ubuntu Package
> > Search'.
>
> > > 2009/6/26 "mitcho (Michael 芳貴 Erlewine <[email protected]>
>
> > >> The tab completion is a feature we hope to keep, but unfortunately as
> > >> you've discovered it is only functioning in limited circumstances
> > >> right now. However, in my testing the tab completion of command names
> > >> only should be working. If this is not the case for you, I'd love to
> > >> know. If the first suggestion is not the right verb you want, you can
> > >> arrow down to the righ verb and tab that one.
>
> > >> mitcho (Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine)
>
> > >> On Jun 26, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Timur Izhbulatov <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> > Hi list,
>
> > >> > Recently I've updated to the latest 0.5 beta and noticed a very
> > >> > significant change in the command completion.
>
> > >> > Previously, to start a Google search I would just invoke Ubiquity,
> > >> > type 'goo' or even just 'go', then press Tab to complete the command,
> > >> > enter the query and press Enter.
>
> > >> > But now, even when I've already typed 'goo', the first item in the
> > >> > suggestions lists is 'add to google calendar' and I can't just press
> > >> > Tab to cycle over suggestions and choose 'google'. I'm forced to use
> > >> > arrow keys instead.
>
> > >> > In my opinion, this greatly reduces Ubiquity's usability and I would
> > >> > like to know if there is a way to change this behaviour.
>
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > --
> > >> > Timur Izhbulatov ―www.timka.org
>
> > > --
> > > Brandon James Pung
> > > Massachusetts Institute of Technology Class of 2010
> > > Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
> > > 828.777.8640 | [email protected]
>
> > --
> > Timur Izhbulatov —www.timka.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ubiquity-firefox" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to