On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Timur Izhbulatov<[email protected]> wrote:
> As Christian noticed, these combinations are already used for new
> window and print. I wonder if it's safe to redefine them when Ubiquity
> is active.

It's safe and certainly possible: http://gist.github.com/43341

Just like Vim/Emacs, Ubiquity is fully customizable. ;)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ubiquity-firefox" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ubiquity-firefox?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to