It's not hysteria when they extract money from us for future promises and we had to pay a premium to get the equipment early without the needed features.
On 11/2/2014 8:01 PM, Larry A. Weidig wrote: > Not so sure it is hysteria as annoyance. The lack of any real answers from > Ubiquiti about this, the nearly turtle pace that development of this product > line goes at,... Internally I kid with myself (only have jokingly) that > Cambium will release 5.6 of the ePMP line before Ubiquiti does. Each of > their releases have significant updates as well. > > > Larry A. Weidig ( [email protected] ) > Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/ > (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area > (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:56:03 PM > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 > > Tone down the hysteria guys. The FCC certifies manufacturers in batch. > When Ubiquiti had to pull a radio from the FCC for an issue, all their > radios went to the back of the line. That included the Powerbeam. > That's the delay. But yes, the PowerBridge not getting certified > totally sucked. I've got a bunch of them. > > Rory > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Paul > Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 5:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 > > So you are saying we take a risk every time we buy ubnt equipment of > notting getting what was promised and expected unless it is already > there? Maybe we shouldn't trust ubnt at their word? > I have a lot invested in ubnt and they are not feeling very much like a > partner anymore! > > > On 11/2/2014 6:41 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> On 11/2/14, 4:20 PM, Paul wrote: >>> So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought >>> will not certify because of hardware problems? >>> >> No, he said they have a history of not certifying everything and thus >> a risk of such a situation. The PowerBridge M5 for example. >> >> ~Seth >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users _______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
