I'm replacing 5.8 links with 3.65 links to make room in the 5.8 band. We don't get a lot a Apache's around here, mostly NMNG Blackhawk's with Inferred SLR looking for pot farms.
Phil On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: > For what it's worth, I've moved all my APs with Rockets and Nanostations > to DFS and 5150-5250 frequencies to free up space for the PowerBeam 400's > in 5.8GHz. I know not everyone can do that but it's an option. > > Rory > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Rory Conaway > Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:32 PM > To: Ubiquiti Users Group > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 > > Look, Ben and Matt are on this board. If you have a complaint, tell them > directly and give them a chance to make it right. If they don't, then make > that public. The manufacturer should be liable to defective products, no > question, but nobody wants a reputation for cheating the customer, > especially not in a small and public community like this. As for the DFS > channels, I'm sure that will get resolved and there was enough information > around that you should have known that feature, along with PTMP, wasn't > going to happen soon. But this is a small problem compared to the cable > and Rocket GPS. In those cases, the product either didn't deliver what it > was supposed to or simply fell apart. Different situation. > > Rory > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Paul > Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 > > But we are stuck paying the bill. Especially on the cable crap and time to > replace and equipment setting on the shelf unable to use. > > > On 11/2/2014 8:20 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: > > With the Rocket GPS, I agree. The should have publicly offered to buy > every single unit back. I'm still sitting with 1/2 roll of the crappy melt > in the sun cable that I have to RMA. With this situation though, part of > it was Ubiquiti's fault, part of it was the FCC process and the > inefficiency of government in general. Holding an entire industry back for > months at a time is another example why other countries out-manufacture us > and our politicians are inept at best, crooked at worst, for allowing this > to happen. > > > > Rory > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul > > Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:09 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 > > > > It's not hysteria when they extract money from us for future promises > and we had to pay a premium to get the equipment early without the needed > features. > > > > On 11/2/2014 8:01 PM, Larry A. Weidig wrote: > >> Not so sure it is hysteria as annoyance. The lack of any real answers > from Ubiquiti about this, the nearly turtle pace that development of this > product line goes at,... Internally I kid with myself (only have jokingly) > that Cambium will release 5.6 of the ePMP line before Ubiquiti does. Each > of their releases have significant updates as well. > >> > >> > >> Larry A. Weidig ( [email protected] ) Excel.Net, Inc. – > >> http://www.excel.net/ > >> (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area > >> (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> > >> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:56:03 PM > >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 > >> > >> Tone down the hysteria guys. The FCC certifies manufacturers in batch. > >> When Ubiquiti had to pull a radio from the FCC for an issue, all > >> their radios went to the back of the line. That included the Powerbeam. > >> That's the delay. But yes, the PowerBridge not getting certified > >> totally sucked. I've got a bunch of them. > >> > >> Rory > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] > >> On Behalf Of Paul > >> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 5:45 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 > >> > >> So you are saying we take a risk every time we buy ubnt equipment of > >> notting getting what was promised and expected unless it is already > >> there? Maybe we shouldn't trust ubnt at their word? > >> I have a lot invested in ubnt and they are not feeling very much like > >> a partner anymore! > >> > >> > >> On 11/2/2014 6:41 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > >>> On 11/2/14, 4:20 PM, Paul wrote: > >>>> So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought > >>>> will not certify because of hardware problems? > >>>> > >>> No, he said they have a history of not certifying everything and > >>> thus a risk of such a situation. The PowerBridge M5 for example. > >>> > >>> ~Seth > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Ubnt_users mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >>> > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ubnt_users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ubnt_users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Ubnt_users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > _______________________________________________ > > Ubnt_users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > _______________________________________________ > > Ubnt_users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
