Most of my links are within 1 mile. All in all, I like the dishes better as
well. Shipping is what kills us here in AK though.

I am looking forward to the light beams, but they probably won't work right
for another year or so after they start shipping if UBNT follows the same
release pattern as there other newly released products :)

On Oct 9, 2016 6:15 AM, "Phil Curnutt" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 8 beta-17.  I replaced the pair of 19 with a pair of PBE-5AC-300 and the
> link works just as expected.  After looking at the antenna patterns of the
> 16's and 19's it looks as if the beam is to wide with overly large side
> lobes, so most of the Tx power is being wasted on a PtP or PtMP that is
> over .5 miles long.  Seeing as the cost of the 300 is with in a few bucks
> of the 19's we are going to only use the 300s.
>
> Phil
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Chris Ruschmann <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I do have this issue on several ptmp connections using the latest beta
>> firmware. I figured it was a bug. What firmware are you running?
>>
>> On Oct 6, 2016 1:39 PM, "Phil Curnutt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I had a short back bone link from one small AP to another so used a pair
>>> of NBE-5AC-19's expecting an Rx of around -55.  After connecting the
>>> link the best we could get was a -66 on Chain0 and a -77 on Chain1 when the
>>> radios were at the proper tilt and azimuth.  With help from the Alignment
>>> Tool we got it down to a -60/-70, but AP end of the link was aimed about 5
>>> degree down rather then 1 degree up.  We could achieve the same Chain0,
>>> Chain1 imbalance the other way with the AP aimed 1 degree up and the
>>> Station aimed 6 degrees down.  I replace the Station end with a PBE-5AC-300
>>> and dropped the Chain0/Chain1 signals to -60/-70, but no better.  So, today
>>> I replace the AP end with another 300 and the signal dropped to -47/-47.
>>>
>>> So, the question is has anyone else seen this behavior in the NanoBeam?
>>> We have a bunch of them in use on PtMP AP's using sectors and they work
>>> just as expected, but when used as PtP this weird astigmatism shows up.
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to