Tyson,

Yes, The AC Prism AP will outperform the original rocket by about 70% in our 
opinion.  We have been doing what you are asking about in our 
Bloomington/Peoria market and the Prism's are great. We have both legacy M 
series bridges and beams as well as new AC CPE and all are performing well.  We 
did have a few places where we also switched out the Sector Antennas to RF 
30deg horns which really lowered the noise floor.

Garth

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
Sent: 12/22/2016 1:42:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases

> This may be slightly off topic but only considering it because of peoples 
> input on good performance of mixed ap mode on newer rocket prisms with the 
> new firmwares.  We have lots of 5.8 sectors with almost all nano beam m5s 
> connected to them and have been wanting to migrate ac clients in the mix and 
> upgrade the rockets aps to ac rocket prisms aps but waiting to pull that 
> trigger until i saw some real world examples of mixed mode working well.  So 
> my question is if its lopsided and mostly just m5 beam clients and i migrate 
> to ac clients as needed will the ac prism rockets aps perform just as well or 
> better than our rocket ap m5s we currently have up? 
>  
> --------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware 
> Releases
> From: [email protected]
> Date: 12/22/16 2:17 pm
> To: "James Craig" <[email protected]>, "Ubiquiti Users Group" 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> James
>  is there anything I have to be worried about before upgrading my network 
>  because I am still on 5.6.9 with powerbeams,nanostation,rocket m2/m5's.
>  
>  On 2016-12-22 14:14, James Craig via Ubnt_users wrote:
>  > Hi Keith,
>  > 
>  > Sending you an email for more details.
>  > 
>  > Also, Were these stations mostly XM based stations that wouldn't
>  > connect, or a mix?
>  > 
>  > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Keith Yoder <[email protected]>
>  > wrote:
>  > 
>  >> We updated about 1700 radios over the weekend. Yesterday afternoon
>  >> we sent the APs back to 5.6.9 because our phones wouldn't stop
>  >> ringing. Symptoms where bunches of CPEs not connected. A reboot of
>  >> the AP usually fixed things but we can't be babysitting a hundred
>  >> APs all day long.
>  >> 
>  >> We had been testing the beta versions from about b15 on and hadn't
>  >> really noticed this problem. We went from RC2 to the release
>  >> version. (we skipped RC3)
>  >> 
>  >> Keith Yoder
>  >> 
>  >> 2016-12-22 15:27 GMT-03:00 Steve D <[email protected]>:
>  >> 
>  >> Updating CPE first? Mike, you secretly started drinking the
>  >> Ubuiquiti koolaid? You of all people are going to let them get away
>  >> with shoddy QA? It's okay if new cpe are deployed one at a time are
>  >> at or newer, but when doing a system wide upgrade, no f'n way. The
>  >> damn things should be able to be newer or older and just connect and
>  >> just work regardless.
>  >> 
>  >> A stone-cold reliable updating process should be number one on their
>  >> list. I just updated some scabby old canopy network we acquired a
>  >> couple weeks ago from versions 6-10 years old and it just worked, no
>  >> BS. Did the AP first. Then brought up a handful of CPE. Then the
>  >> whole works. We don't even have addresses for all these locations
>  >> so really didn't want to truck roll. But I trust that update
>  >> system.
>  >> 
>  >> A primary/secondary firmware loading system ought to get on their
>  >> to-do list at the very least. If people can't trust the damn things
>  >> to work without truck rolls, then people won't update firmware.
>  >> Period.
>  >> 
>  >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Mike Hammett
>  >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>  >> 
>  >> I think the clients should always be at equal or greater version
>  >> than the AP, regardless of the platform.
>  >> 
>  >> -----
>  >> Mike Hammett
>  >> 
>  >> Intelligent Computing Solutions [1]
>  >> [2] [3] [4] [5]
>  >> 
>  >> Midwest Internet Exchange [6]
>  >> [7] [8] [9]
>  >> 
>  >> The Brothers WISP [10]
>  >> [11] [12]
>  >> 
>  >> -------------------------
>  >> 
>  >> FROM: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]>
>  >> TO: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]>
>  >> SENT: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 2:08:38 PM
>  >> 
>  >> SUBJECT: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases
>  >> 
>  >> I just test it with an XM Rocket 5M. All clients on beta 15. 41
>  >> users online. After installation, 18 users came up. Went back to
>  >> Beta, 41 users online again. I'm not sure if I have to make all the
>  >> clients 6.0 first but I do know that this is exactly what we saw
>  >> with RC3 and we had to go to a lot of houses to unload it when they
>  >> wouldn't reconnect. We refer to that as hell week.
>  >> 
>  >> Rory
>  >> 
>  >> -----Original Message-----
>  >> From: [email protected]
>  >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Bright
>  >> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 10:08 AM
>  >> To: [email protected]
>  >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases
>  >> 
>  >> On 12/20/2016 9:43 AM, Kevin Lamothe wrote:
>  >>> My experiences so far:
>  >>> 
>  >>> 8.0 is stable
>  >>> 
>  >>> 6.0 is stable running on 5GHz only. 2.4GHz and 900MHz AP/cpes will
>  >> 
>  >>> randomly disconnect or goto sleep. Downgrading it back to 5.6.9
>  >> fixed
>  >>> it for us.
>  >>> 
>  >>> Ubiquiti is reviewing some support files I sent em.
>  >> Remember kids: Just say no to dot-oh. :D
>  >> 
>  >> --
>  >> -----------------------------------------------
>  >> - Nick Bright -
>  >> - Vice President of Technology -
>  >> - Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- -
>  >> - Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 [13] / Fax 620-331-0789 [14] -
>  >> - Web http://www.valnet.net/ -
>  >> -----------------------------------------------
>  >> - Are your files safe? -
>  >> - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup -
>  >> - More information & 30 day free trial at -
>  >> - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault [15] -
>  >> -----------------------------------------------
>  >> 
>  >> This email message and any attachments are intended solely for the
>  >> use of the addressees hereof. This message and any attachments may
>  >> contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from
>  >> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
>  >> recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading,
>  >> disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise
>  >> using this transmission. If you have received this message in error,
>  >> please promptly notify the sender by reply E-mail and immediately
>  >> delete this message from your system.
>  >> 
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>  >> [email protected]
>  >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>  >> [email protected]
>  >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>  >> 
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>  >> [email protected]
>  >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>  >> 
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >> Ubnt_users mailing list
>  >> [email protected]
>  >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>  > 
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Ubnt_users mailing list
>  > [email protected]
>  > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users [16]
>  > 
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Links:
>  > ------
>  > [1] http://www.ics-il.com/
>  > [2] https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
>  > [3] https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
>  > [4] https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
>  > [5] https://twitter.com/ICSIL
>  > [6] http://www.midwest-ix.com/
>  > [7] https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
>  > [8] https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
>  > [9] https://twitter.com/mdwestix
>  > [10] http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/
>  > [11] https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp
>  > [12] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg
>  > [13] tel:(888)%20332-1616
>  > [14] tel:(620)%20331-0789
>  > [15] http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault
>  > [16] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Ubnt_users mailing list
>  > [email protected]
>  > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ubnt_users mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 

_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to