cost of freq coordination ? paying someone $600 /$700 to get a 10 year license ? ( + FCC fee )
Really ???? :) Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > From: "Chris Soiles" <[email protected]> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 7:50:02 AM > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Part 101 Spectrum Grab (was 4096 QAM) > I agree with the spectrum grab, my problem is the cost of frequency > coordination, what is everyone doing for coord? > Doing it yourself? > Any hardware vendors absorbing some of it, making it affordable? > Any kind of subscription type consultants, x$ per month and you get x number > of > assistance to spread out the expense? > Sent from iPhone 6S Plus > Chris Soiles > Owner > Rio Cities > [email protected] > 505-966-6389 > On Apr 13, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Mimbres Communications < [email protected] > > wrote: >> Waking up a bit late here as well, and we're *seriously* rural (second least >> populated county in the sixth least populated state in the nation). The power >> company and the mine both have all manner of dual-pol 40 MHz links on 6 GHz >> and >> 11 GHz running hither and yon. 400+ mbits full duplex to a substation? Sure, >> why not? >> AF-11FX at 56 MHz just meets the 101.147 efficiency requirements for an 80 >> MHz >> channel at 256 QAM. Engineer your links at 1024 QAM and you can probably >> secure >> the channel. Upgrade that to 4096 QAM on the full 80 MHz in a few years and >> you're golden. >> The rules are probably due for a re-work at some point. The traffic loading >> requirements are ripe for a legal challenge and I suspect somebody's likely >> to >> pull that lever in the next few years. >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Faisal Imtiaz < [email protected] > >> wrote: >>> "Conserve Spectrum" .... >>> "Waste of Resources".... >>> "Spectrum Efficiency"..... >>> Where are you folks living ? Dream Land ? ...... >>> When are going to wake up and realize that the battle is purely about >>> spectrum >>> grab..... >>> My advice to you all newbies.... get the biggest chunk of 11ghz spectrum >>> channels you can get and put up the radios that you can afford that will >>> chew >>> up the whole channel.... you can always get a better radio in the future (or >>> when you can afford it).. but very surely you may not be so lucky in finding >>> extra spectrum when you need it in the future.... >>> Doing anything less, is very likely to endanger your future business well >>> being..... >>> Can me whatever you like........ >>> But take it from someone who is waking up to this rather late.... i.e. >>> virtually >>> impossible to find 6ghz paths, virtually impossible to find 11ghz paths, and >>> 18ghz are going fast too... BTW, we are in Rain Zone N.... which means only >>> 11ghz & 6ghz are practical for any reasonable distance... >>> (BTW in our area, no 3.65, no CBRS, sprint is sitting on 2.5....ahhh >>> !...but we >>> can use 24Ghz & 60Ghz & EBand !!!!! ) >>> ..... you think your industry peers are going to play nice with conserving >>> spectrum ' !!! Think again... >>> e.g. http://about.att.com/story/att_to_acquire_straight_path.html >>> Follow the bigger story starting with the FCC & Straight Path ... >> -- >> Kurt Albershardt | Mimbres Communications, LLC | 575-342-0042 >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
