Thorsten Wilms a écrit : > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:13 +0100, François Degrave wrote: > > >> I'd rather think this is because Adobe has nothing to do with pdf >> anymore; I still think that no reference to an app should appear in a >> file icon if this app is not installed and meant to deal with this kind >> of files. I truly think that a file icon containing a "Adobe" logo means >> to the user: if I open this, it will be launched in Adobe Reader. >> > > > I agree. However, it shouldn't be about what is installed. I'd say: a > mime-type icon should, or rather may, only include or refer to an > application icon, if that application is the only one that deals with > that file-type (ability to open files in a text-editor or hex-viewer or > similar doesn't count, of course). > I totally agree. That means doc, xls, ppt files should not refer to Ms Office apps, neither should pdf refer to Adobe or psd to Photoshop -- ok the last one is the only that can entirely deal with psd, however some image viewers can render psd nicely and The Gimp can edit them to a certain extend (plus it seems strange to have a reference in Linux to an app that is not even available on this platform).
-- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
