>> Thank you, if you look through this thread, there are a few other >> variations >> I did. >> Adding stroke, trying a different version of the Ubuntu Title Font. >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27617704/humanity-msword.svg Stroke >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27626085/humanity-msword2.svg Stroke with >> alternate font
I like the second one. Why? I think it seems more dynamic, and may convey the idea of "filetype" better. The reason I say this is because a W fully contained within the document could give the impression of it just being a text file - "letters in a document". Whereas, a W partially inside but slightly outside would, in my opinion, give the impression of it being part of the document and at the same time, _not_ part of the document, perhaps giving more meaning to the typical user - i.e. W being the filetype, which is in essence ephemeral to the end user. :) Just my attempts at logically laying out why I like the second one better :P Feel free to rip apart my statement. -Chris -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
