How about the fact that I have to change it yet again once the new Ubuntu font
gets finished?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brand
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:37:50 -0800
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] .doc, .xls, etc icons in Humanity Update
>
> >> Thank you, if you look through this thread, there are a few other
> >> variations
> >> I did.
> >> Adding stroke, trying a different version of the Ubuntu Title Font.
> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27617704/humanity-msword.svg Stroke
> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p27626085/humanity-msword2.svg Stroke with
> >> alternate font
>
> I like the second one.
>
> Why? I think it seems more dynamic, and may convey the idea of
> "filetype" better. The reason I say this is because a W fully
> contained within the document could give the impression of it just
> being a text file - "letters in a document". Whereas, a W partially
> inside but slightly outside would, in my opinion, give the impression
> of it being part of the document and at the same time, _not_ part of
> the document, perhaps giving more meaning to the typical user - i.e.
> W being the filetype, which is in essence ephemeral to the end user.
>
> :) Just my attempts at logically laying out why I like the second one
> better :P Feel free to rip apart my statement.
>
> -Chris
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469229/direct/01/--
ubuntu-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
