On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 09:23 +0000, Bruno Girin wrote: > > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2010/03/13/ubuntu-manual-title-page/
> I can't tell the difference between a and b but I like them: they are > simple and clean and the circle of friends pattern at the bottom says > "Ubuntu" to me. Title text in bold vs regular weight. > c is a bit top heavy, with this big blob of colour on top and a large > empty space below. > > d is OK but the white text on light orange background at the bottom is > difficult to read. > > f, g and h feel a bit boring: even though the design is shifted to the > right, all elements in the block are centred; and the dots don't have > any obvious meaning, apart from filling empty space (and possibly making > you feel that it's a big heavy manual that you don't want to read). > > Generally speaking, I prefer the flush left design of a and b to the > centred design of the others. I also feel that in c, d, e and f, the > logo is a little too large compared to the rest of the design. > > But all of this is subjective, they are all good designs. Thank you Bruno, this is a very helpful comment. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ -- ubuntu-art mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
