Randall Crook wrote: > Jeff Waugh wrote: >> <quote who="Jiri Baum"> >> >> >>> Mark Phillips: >>> >>>>> I think we have more to lose than gain by this meeting and should >>>>> focus our efforts elsewhere. >>>>> >>> Jeff Waugh: >>> >>>> I've yet to be convinced that there's much of consequence to be lost, >>>> given the venue and subject matter. >>>> >>> Agreed, not much is likely to be lost; but neither is it going to be the >>> "lions' mouth" that you were so optimistic about earlier. >>> >>> And, of course, Mark is right - there's an opportunity cost. We could have >>> had a talk about a technology - any technology - rather than a company. >>> Since when are LUG talks titled by company rather than technology/project, >>> anyway? >>> >> You've made your concerns and disinterest clear. Given that you're not even >> in Sydney, and that SLUG is going ahead with it anyway, I'm not sure you are >> going to achieve anything through repetitive negativity and argumentation. >> >> - Jeff >> >> > Hi all, if I could ask Microsoft a question, I already have (Not expecting an answer). That is why do they as good as call me/others a thief, when after installing XP I still have to contact them to prove I have a valid copy. Sorry but I find this to be insulting and offensive, and am sure anywhere else would possibly be grounds to sue. I can circumvent this by removing and re-installing every 29 days anyway, will give me another 29 days. Another question would be, why is it so hard to get a refund, am at present trying :-) .
I feel that Linux should be very careful at this meeting, I seriously doubt they wish to attend out of the goodness of their hearts. take Care Winton -- ubuntu-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
