Hi Id say : https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim-runtime/+bug/592427 : Low importance since its not a very important issue, the akonadi settings can easily be accessed via other means and it worked for alot of people in #kubuntu-devel, but since the user was using gnome, i cant say if it will or will not work for him. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/desktopcouch/+bug/565376 : also warrants a low since its been fixed for maverick ( IDK if the importance for this bug should really be set since its fix released, and warrants a importance level after its been fixed )
Regards Rohan Garg On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten <[email protected]> wrote: > First, I want to say thank you for all your hard work with Kubuntu > packaging. > > On 09/06/2010 12:53 PM, Rohan Garg wrote: > > Hi > > Im Rohan Garg and i wish to apply for bugcontrol. > > > > 1) Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are rude to > > you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > Yes to both > > 2) Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>, Bugs/Assignment > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment>, Bugs/Status > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status> and Bugs/Importance > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance>? Do you have any questions > > about that documentation? > > Yes, no questions on the docs > > 3) What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage> for more information. > > I usually look for > > a) CoreDump.gz > > b) Stacktrace.txt for sensitive data > > 4) Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > > interested in helping out with? > > KDE specific bugs are my specialty. > > All good so far. > > > 5) Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs > > should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to > > properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not have > an > > importance indicate what importance (and explain the reasoning) you > > would give it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please use > > urls in your list of bugs. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/k3b/+bug/596926 > I'm assuming you asked Scott K to set the importance for you here. I > would agree with High here. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/325370 > Ditto here. Importance of Wishlist is appropriate. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/613636 > > Importance > > should be high since the boot splash is a integral process of the the > > boot process and should show Kubuntu branding when booting > While important for Kubuntu's image, this doesn't seem to warrant a High > Importance since the boot process is working fine, just the graphic > appears to be wrong. According to > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance, this should be Low. Please > note, *I* believe that Importance (Ubuntu's severity) should not > necessarily affect *when* a bug is fixed. This should definitely be > fixed before Maverick is released. That might make it High for some > people. I would not count this against you though. > > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim-runtime/+bug/592427This > > bug should be set as fixed once the user reverts back with his testing > > results > No importance listed here. > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/desktopcouch/+bug/565376 > Again, no importance. > > > > > > Regards > > Rohan Garg > > Rohan, > Do you have Importance for the last 2 bugs? > > +0 for now, pending the other 2 bugs' Importance >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
