Sent to myself and it worked fine so I really hope it will be readable this time. >> Would set importance according >> to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WineTeam/Contributing, setting upstreamed >> bugs to Triaged > > Actually, no, You are expected to set the importance according to > *Ubuntu* rules [1]. Upstream's importance does not really play here > (although, most of the times, Ubuntu and upstream do match). Okay, sorry about that but was directed there by Wine team documentation (which I guess should be sorted!). They seem to accord more-or-less anyway. > But, anyway, you did not indicate what importance you would have set > on any of the bugs below. > >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/607970 > > Thank you for upstreaming this bug. Good work (and I also frankly > doubt if it will be resolved, but who knows). I would mark this as Low since it affects a non-core application and is an unusual request
>> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/614546 > > Why did you mark it Fix Released for wine-1.2 (Ubuntu)? Have we > already published the fix on Maverick? I do not think so, since the > fix is on Wine 1.3.1. The actual stati should be: > > Fix Released for the upstream > Triaged for the Ubuntu task. > > A bug is only considered Fix Released on Ubuntu when we publish the > fixed version. Okay, sorry about that -- got a bit confused because I assumed there would be a wine1.3 package in Maverick like in the wine ppa. Bad assumption! Thanks for fixing it up.Probably again Low since it affects a minor application.Incidentally the Latin plural of 'status' is 'statūs' (4th declension, masculine), so 'statuses' is probably better! :D >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/479223 >> -- added link to already filed upstream > > Thank you for the upstream link. Would set this as Low since it's a rare/old application >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/601715 > > OK. What was triaged here? Sorry, I think that might have been a mistake (although I have requested further information and marked 'Incomplete')Have https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/624386 instead, which I have confirmed and requested be upstreamed, then provided further information on the upstream report and made the upstream link.I would set the importance of this as Low since it is a rare application that I'm not convinced is necessary/ever going to work on Linux >> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/+bug/502375 >> -- duped a number of bugs which display the same symptoms to it, >> requested more information about other sound-related bugs which >> don't seem immediately linked to this > > Ugh! Sound bugs are nasty. It might be worth the time to check with > the sound/pulseaudio experts. The only issue I have here is the fact > that there are three different releases of Ubuntu (and two-ish of Wine) > playing, not counting the sound stack. Here I may set the importance to Medium since it has a much wider impact.Should I just ask someone in #ubuntu-bugs regarding the sound bugs (before duping?)? I was careful in leaving a number alone for now.Upstream wine aren't very forgiving regarding pulseaudio and wine is due to be moving to openAL so these are in flux a little at the moment, I guess. > All in all, a nice work, but needs more attention to the triaging > documentation. I still want like to know what would you set as > Importance on these bugs. > > Vote as of now is, then, > > 0. > > Cheers, Thanks for the feedback! _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
