Hola, El vie, 10-09-2010 a las 14:06 +0200, Philip Muskovac escribió: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Micah Gersten <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > First, I want to say thank you for all your hard work with Kubuntu > > packaging. > > > > On 09/06/2010 12:53 PM, Rohan Garg wrote: > > > Hi > > > Im Rohan Garg and i wish to apply for bugcontrol. > > > > > > 1) Do you promise to be polite to bug reporters even if they are > > rude to > > > you or Ubuntu? Have you signed the Ubuntu Code of Conduct? > > > Yes to both > > > 2) Have you read Bugs/HowToTriage > > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage>, Bugs/Assignment > > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment>, Bugs/Status > > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status> and Bugs/Importance > > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance>? Do you have any questions > > > about that documentation? > > > Yes, no questions on the docs > You should read the importance page again, while I agree with the > importances you have given here, the reasoning for the desktopcouch bug > is wrong. (be objective) > > > > 3) What sensitive data should you look for in a private Apport crash > > > report bug before making it public? See Bugs/HowToTriage > > > <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage> for more information. > > > I usually look for > > > a) CoreDump.gz > > > b) Stacktrace.txt for sensitive data > > > 4) Is there a particular package or group of packages that you are > > > interested in helping out with? > > > KDE specific bugs are my specialty. > > > > All good so far. > > > > > 5) Please list five or more bugs which you have triaged. These bugs > > > should demonstrate your understanding of the triage process and how to > > > properly handle bugs. If there is a bug in your list that does not > > have an > > > importance indicate what importance (and explain the reasoning) you > > > would give it after becoming a member of Ubuntu Bug Control. Please > > use > > > urls in your list of bugs. > > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/k3b/+bug/596926 > > I'm assuming you asked Scott K to set the importance for you here. I > > would agree with High here. > note: not every reporter understands '<bug #>', please replace that in > the future. I agree with the importance. > > > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/325370 > > Ditto here. Importance of Wishlist is appropriate. > agreed. > > > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/613636 > > Importance > > > should be high since the boot splash is a integral process of the the > > > boot process and should show Kubuntu branding when booting > > While important for Kubuntu's image, this doesn't seem to warrant a High > > Importance since the boot process is working fine, just the graphic > > appears to be wrong. According to > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance, this should be Low. Please > > note, *I* believe that Importance (Ubuntu's severity) should not > > necessarily affect *when* a bug is fixed. This should definitely be > > fixed before Maverick is released. That might make it High for some > > people. I would not count this against you though. > I agree with Micahg here, this is a simple usability bug but the kubuntu > team might consider it High.g > > So now that we have all importances, and considering the work you have > been doing for Kubuntu, I'll give a +1.
Looks ok to me, nothing more to add besides the comments from Micah and Philip. +1 from here as well. Have a nice day, pedro. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
