*bonk* - the sound of my head hitting the desk. New theory:
A race would have been fun, but for my bug(s), pointing /etc/resolv.conf straight to ns.ubuntu.com satisfies apt-get. The difference? ns.ubuntu.com is authoritative. So is apt-get's use of getaddrinfo(3) throwing out non-authoritative responses? ...If it is, is there a reason for this? Did I miss a memo where non-authoritative caches are now considered dangerous? Of course, `dig` hand-crafts its own queries so it's only good for looking at DNS "reality," not resolver behavior. -- [Jaunty] Multiple DNS resolver issues on ia32 and AMD64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
