On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:52:21AM -0000, hub_cap wrote: > I have 9.10 installed on HD (using Grub) and 10.04 on a USB drive (using > Grub 2). Am I now required to use Grub-PC? which I find is more > difficult to use and is complicated beyond belief. It is assumed that > everyone has chosen to change to grub-pc?
It is not a requirement that you use Grub 2 (grub-pc), but if you remove the bootloader that was selected at install time in favor of another, you have to *configure* that bootloader for use. This wasn't done, so the grub hook can't do its job when a new kernel is installed and the only sensible action is to fail out. > Why do you install grub 2 when given a choice during installation of > 10.04? Grub2 is the preferred bootloader because it's the only one for which upstream development is ongoing. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
