Thomas Hood wrote: > Worry: Physical interfaces are marked "auto" but the "dns-" fields are in > logical interface > stanzas. So we have to assume that only logical interface stanzas are used > that are named > like the corresponding physical interface.
Not sure I understand the difference here. In my understanding the name used in the auto and iface lines, both refer to a logical interface (iow after they have been renamed by udev/kernel based). > Worry: Configuration can be split across multiple files by means of the "source" feature. Agreed that this makes it complicated. Though I must admit, that I am not sure since when such a thing existed in previous releases. If the man page is correct (in Oneriric) options are quite limited. > Can we boil the proposal down to this?: Mostly agree. The only thing that worries me is that I do not understand what exactly an outcome of merging things will be and what effects that "priority critical" will have. The link-tail-to original only happens when there is nothing in e/n/i that would create any content. So the dynamic part is empty (unless the configuration is changed). IMO this results in a dynamic file that should be the same as before. That could change when the admin only adds dhcp interfaces or dns- lines without removing the file used to append. Would that break the system? But in general I think this sounds like it should work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923685 Title: New resolver package overwrites manually created resolv.conf on server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resolvconf/+bug/923685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
