I think the friction here is between Canonical, who are using Linux,
GTK, et al as a platform to develop a "walled garden" type setup and
those who see Ubuntu as "just another Linux distro".  Yes, "walled
garden" is a bit overstated being that Ubuntu remains open source, but
given the limited resources that are an inherent limitation in most FOSS
projects, the net result isn't too far off the mark.

As Mark repeatedly mentions, OSX does things this way to good effect. I
think if you want a typical Linux distro, Ubuntu is the wrong place to
look. Ubuntu is developing into its own OS, complete with incompatible
desktop, utilities, APIs, etc. I'm not making a value judgement, merely
pointing out that people who want a typical Linux distro are pretty much
guaranteed to be disappointed.  I'd also say the same thing about
distros such as Elementary OS. They don't aim for compatibility, rather
they want to push the desktop paradigm and compatibility is a drag on
such an endeavor.

If you want a "Linux distro", there's plenty to choose from. If you want
the "Canonical experience", whatever that may evolve to be, then stick
with Ubuntu. Personally, I plan on moving to something else at some
point because I seek the former (and am quite pleased with GNOME Shell
these days), but I can see the futility of trying to hold back Ubuntu
with legacy support.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974480

Title:
  Notification area whitelist is obsolete

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/974480/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to