Hello Michael, and thank you for the review. I don't mind the questions, better ask too many than too few, especially when they're relevant :)
1) Ok, done 2) Ok, done. I did not know about /usr/libexec but from what I've now been reading it seems a better place than /usr/bin: https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch04s07.html > /usr/libexec includes internal binaries that are not intended to be executed > directly by users or shell scripts 3) Indeed. My understanding of the doc is the same as yours, so 1.0ubuntu it is. 4) I did not know that setting Priority: important would be enough. If that is, yes it's fine, although having the package anywhere else than arm64 is currently useless. My previous plan was to put it as part of some seed (like in here https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/tree/server-ship-live?h=questing#n64). How is that different? As for if the kernel team would reconsider this blacklist, I asked them again just in case. For Noble, it will probably be a no even if Resolute was to be a yes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2132001 Title: [needs-packaging] dgx-desktop-sbsa-gwdt-loader To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2132001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
