Pretty obviously I made a guess after seeing a lot of updates get pushed and no recurrences after more than a week- I realized that guess was erroneous after seeing two recurrences last week. Or maybe the issue was fixed but was re-introduced for v24, just as described for the v26 branch in comment #5.
Even more obviously, the people verifying issues, developing, QA- testing, and pushing updates probably should have known there wasn't a (lasting?) fix for the v24 branch and that in comment #13 I was mistaken. So if this issue cannot be re-opened then whose responsibility is it to re-create it? Because LTS should mean something more than "So the fix is coming in Ubuntu 26.10, and when that's complete we can think about fixing 26.04 and 24.04." Because how would you feel about unnecessarily paying lots of extra moolah on your power bill, the prospect of replacing an expensive monitor or a whole dev or gaming class laptop months or years early because of this uncorrected issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2148306 Title: Idle inhibition persists when updates are pending, preventing screen blanking To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2148306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
