To be clear, most that I see is fine - and given the amount that is a great sign. All things are "as bad as before or better" and iterating on this is the progression we wanted to see.
For my request above to retain changelog history - that is fine to be done next version bump, no blocker now. But before accepting any I wanted to ask two more things: 1. the ordering In the past NEW queue review we got asked to accept the following first and then a second set and then the rest. cuda-cudart-13-1, Libcublas-13-1, libcufile-13-1, libcusparse-13-1, libnvjitlink-13-1 Does such still matter, or could they all be accepted at once and work it out via build depends? 2. renaming cuda-cccl I get that "Cuda Core Compute Library (CCCL)" into a package called "cuda-cccl" is one "C" too much. But remember that we here need watch for namespaces of packages as well. Just calling it "cccl" is very non descriptive, as before one could at least thing "ah something cuda" now it could also be "Crying Children’s Care Line" which everyone wants to install. Names so short are otherwise reserved for things everyone knows for ages "wget" or something with a very important reason to do so. I hate to block you after so much work, but is there a chance this could be "cuda-ccl"? That would make the number of "C" to match and keep the nice namespacing and a more recognizable name. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2155655 Title: [needs-packaging] cuda-13-3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2155655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
