apparently there are mixed feelings.
- it looks like debian maintainance got faster (new upstream release in Jan
2008)
- there are other alternatives, like apt-proxy. why prefer apt-cacher?
- Nick Barcet came up with the idea to provide a configuration for squid
instead
(which already is in main).
** Changed in: apt-cacher (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Main Inclusion Report for apt-cacher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191378
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
