In my opinion, apt-cacher-ng (written in C) seems to be a better option.

It uses less resources and is faster than apt-cacher.

-- 
Main Inclusion Report for apt-cacher
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191378
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to