> On Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:20 PM, Xen <l...@xenhideout.nl> wrote:
> > Jarno Suni schreef op 01-12-2016 6:51:
>> You have to be carefull with what to remove:
>> sudo ppa-purge -s linux.dropbox.com ubuntu/
>> would remove dropbox, but
>> sudo ppa-purge -s archive.ubuntu.com ubuntu/
>> might remove the whole ubuntu system!
> But now you are making it even more complex, because an average user is
> not going to know the difference.
I am not making it complex, it is complex. There are many servers for Ubuntu
software (like you can see in Software & Updates, many of them does not have
word ubuntu in its domain name. But hopefully user knows what he/she is
removing, as he/she is probably the one who added the extra repositories in the
> Now you can say that you didn't make it this way... but you are giving
> these informations that are going to confuse people here as well as
> everywhere if they read it.
Don't shoot the messenger. I am telling people should pay attention. Though I
have added simulation mode and recovery function in ppa-purge, so it should be
safe to experiment.
> If there is a problem, fix it, don't tell people to understand archaic
> or difficult to know thought-forms ;-). I mean, demonstrate the proper
> use case, don't feed into all the ones that are not proper. Don't give
> attention to everything people should not use, please.
I demonstrated a proper user case above. Removing dropbox.
> Just placing this firmly in people's minds will increase the change that
> they do the incorrect thing. Because you give attention to it. People
> skim these mails and then subconsciously copy something they have read.
Well, this is not a support channel for end users. This is about discussion of
development for Ubuntu.
> What we have called a Freudian slip of the tongue among other things:
> don't feed people with the wrong stuff to do.
> Not even as a way to say: don't do that.
> You might have read the above statement and then in a moment of lacking
> concentration, as happens to us all at times, you might type the wrong
> line from memory.
> That's why I say: you're making it too complex. If this is documentation
> that you are doing right here, of sorts... then presenting the user with
> 5 different forms, 2 of which are incorrect, so to speak, instead of
> presenting the user with the one form that is correct, is not helpful.
> That's all I was saying mostly. Don't panic. Everything's fine ;-).
> But don't feed into chaos please. If the thing is chaotic, fine, but
> don't present it into everyone's vision for no reason, so to speak. You
> could even say: don't market the chaos.
> I could understand, or I can understand you would be concerned with the
> state of the project or the changes you have made or the support you
> have had or have not had.
> But I just feel that if you let it be in this sense, if you let it rest,
> nothing much will go wrong, I've never heard anyone complain about
> ppa-purge ;-). And it's a nice name. Does what it says right.
It is not just for removing PPAs. Well, there are some bugs reporrted in
Launchpad. I have tried to fix many of them in my work.
> It's a catchy name, everyone is going to remember it.
I agree it is a catchy name.
> The other alternative .... you forget whether it is
> or "apt-add-repository". I am always confused about that one.
> Why? "apt-get" and then "add-apt" do not mix.
> So I would even say the add-apt-repository command needs to be renamed
> to apt-add-repository".
I guess I won't see that happening.
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: