On Saturday, March 19, 2011 12:08:16 am Scott Kitterman wrote: > Dropped server from cc, since it's no OT there. > > On Friday, March 18, 2011 11:55:35 pm Dustin Kirkland wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > On Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:01:51 pm Dustin Kirkland wrote: > ... > > > >> Spiffy, huh? Thanks to everyone who help spread some Aubergine-love > > >> to Ubuntu Server folks! > > > > > > So now every Ubuntu flavor gets Aubergine even though that's not their > > > color scheme? > > > > Until now, Ubuntu and all Ubuntu flavors have inherited a color scheme > > wasn't theirs either, actually. > > > > > How do we over-ride this for Kubuntu (there have been complaints on > > > #kubuntu- devel today)? > > > > I filed and fixed Bug: #730672, on your behalf. > > > > The newt library can now read its palette from a configuration file, > > which is installed using update-alternatives. > > > > + update-alternatives --install /etc/newt/palette newt-palette > > > > /usr/share/newt/palette.ubuntu 50 > > > > + update-alternatives --install /etc/newt/palette newt-palette > > > > /usr/share/newt/palette 20 > > > > Furthermore, the console-setup package now also installs its color > > scheme using update-alternatives as well. > > > > + update-alternatives --install /etc/vtrgb vtrgb > > > > /usr/share/console-setup/vtrgb 50 > > > > Other packages can install palettes and different color schemes at > > different priorities. > > Thanks. How do I get this integrated into D-I to use a different > alternative for Kubuntu?
Perhaps, particularly since this affects a number of different groups and it was introduced after feature freeze with no notice (and no FFe that I recall) it should default to the old behavior and be opt-in for packages/people that want to use alternatives to enable it? Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
