On Monday, July 25, 2011 07:45:50 AM Benjamin Drung wrote: > Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 13:01 +0200 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz: > > On 22.07.2011 10:41, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > > = Development Processes = > > > > > > (2) developer application docs: > > > - too complicated, > > > - unclear expectations > > > > Amounts of want-to-be-ubuntu-developer levels and their names are > > misleading. I wanted to get rights to directly upload my packages and > > when I discussed it with few developers I was told to apply for 'Ubuntu > > Contributing Developer' (plus some text that MOTU status was replaced by > > it from some long time Ubuntu devs). > > > > So I applied and (after ~6 weeks) during UDS-O DMB's meeting I got it. > > Just to understand that what I really needed was 'Per Package Uploader' > > level. So it edited my wiki page and applied again. Today I would > > totally skip first phase as from my perspective it was useless waste of > > time. > > I would recommend people to apply for 'Ubuntu Contributing Developer' > before applying for MOTU or core-dev.
I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is "Ubuntu member that got their membership based on development contribution and not some other kind". Do we really need a different name for this? It might be more clear to just have the DMB grant Ubuntu membership by name rather than have a separate name/team that doesn't actually mean anything different. Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
