On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Mackenzie Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Oliver Grawert <[email protected]> wrote: >> did anyone talk to the persons individually? what did you do to sort this >> in an individual manner with the respective person? > > To Kate, yes. She didn't go off mid-meeting or rant in-channel. I > talked to her later about how to improve her application (like > including representing Ubuntu at DebConf). The others seem to prefer > to air their grievances publicly in-channel.
Actually, I did talk to Dustin too after Marc's application in June. He thinks there's an anti-Canonical biased member of the DMB. I told him seeing as this was the first deferral I'd even seen since joining the DMB*, I haven't seen any other evidence of that, but if he's got some...talk to the TB or CC. I don't know if he did or not. That allegation of anti-Canonical bias is why I made [1] and highlighted the Canonical employees. If there's an anti-Canonical bias, I still don't see it, what with 20% of non-Canonical applicants being rejected and only 11% of Canonical applicants being rejected. * other than the one where someone applied for PPU for packages that weren't in the repo and we told them to do it in the other order [1] http://people.ubuntu.com/~maco.m/dmb_record_keeping.html -- Mackenzie Morgan -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
