On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 04:04:35PM -0800, Evan Broder wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdr...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > non-standard-file-perm wants files with perm 0644 instead of 0664. Is > > this a bug in our build farm? > > I remember there was a point during the last development cycle where > the umask on the buildds was incorrect. Could this be fallout from > that? It seems to be fairly prevalent in our builds:
Yes, there was one such incident due to a broken sudo deployment. We squashed it fairly quickly, but there were some builds in the meantime. I think we checked to make sure that those were all root:root so not too important, but I'd have to check back through IRC logs and the like to make sure. Can you check for more details? I'd like to know if any of these are current, as if so then we still have a buildd problem which we need to fix ASAP. I'd also like to know if there are any files with ownership other than root:root in this set. If you can't get that information easily, then the full list of affected files and packages would be a good start. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
