On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 04:04:35PM -0800, Evan Broder wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdr...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> > non-standard-file-perm wants files with perm 0644 instead of 0664. Is >> > this a bug in our build farm? >> >> I remember there was a point during the last development cycle where >> the umask on the buildds was incorrect. Could this be fallout from >> that? It seems to be fairly prevalent in our builds: > > Yes, there was one such incident due to a broken sudo deployment. We > squashed it fairly quickly, but there were some builds in the meantime. > I think we checked to make sure that those were all root:root so not too > important, but I'd have to check back through IRC logs and the like to > make sure. > > Can you check for more details? I'd like to know if any of these are > current, as if so then we still have a buildd problem which we need to > fix ASAP. I'd also like to know if there are any files with ownership > other than root:root in this set. If you can't get that information > easily, then the full list of affected files and packages would be a > good start.
On a second look, I don't actually think this is connected to that incident. Benjamin's example package, audacity, was last built 4 weeks ago. I've collected all packages/files triggering the warning; it's at http://web.mit.edu/broder/Public/non-standard-file-perm -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
