Corey Burger wrote: > So, in a word, no. It would be throwing away too much without clear gain. >
John, I hate to say it but I'd have to agree with Corey on this one. But, I have a spin. :-) I agree with Corey that we'd lose brand recognition so the icon rebranding (great icons by the way) I think is out. Ubuntu, Kubuntu, and Xubuntu are products, not sub-cats as you listed. The closest synonym would be Canonical -> Ubuntu Canonical -> Kubuntu Canonical -> Xubuntu However I don't think this does them justice. Perhaps someone smarter than me can work on that structure more. I do agree with your observation that the project page difference in formating, site structure, content, etc. between the brands is very confusing. It would be very nice to maintain a sense of uniformity and cohesiveness between the main webpages. Ubuntu and Kubuntu share similar website features but, perhaps by design to allude to the simplistic interface, Xubuntu does not. I don't think there is any reason why the 3 brands/products cannot be drawn in close to these same basic visual structure from a project page perspective.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-marketing mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
