Hi Tim,

On 27/07/06, Tim Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Speaking as someone who gets paid to do market research, the problem
here is clearly one of unclear direction from the client on the target
market.

Great to hear from you and it's good to see that more and more people
with professional marketing experience are taking an interest in the
team.

I think a more fundamental question needs to be answered here: who is
the client you're talking about? Okay, we all know that Canonical
drives much of the project and puts huge amounts of money into it, but
it's worth noting that Canonical is not Ubuntu and Ubuntu is not
Canonical.

If, as a community, we see an opportunity with a certain market
segment, we're free to pursue it.

Certainly, though, it'd be great to have a chat with the Canonical
guys about where they want to focus and how we can combine efforts.

Is the *-buntu product and brand targeted at consumers (students,
mothers, etc.) or at business (SMB, corporate) or government agencies
(schools, libraries) or is it targeted at hardcore linux programmers
(specifically to attract their support and contributions)???

It doesn't have to be an either/or situation. However, if we can
meaningfully identify market segments to target, then we should adjust
the way we communicate with them and what information we gather from
them.

What John has done is a great start, and I think has approach is spot on
ASSUMING the target market is corporate.

Why limit our thinking to one target market?

However, if the target is "hardcore linux programmers" it may not be the
best solution. There is a tension here that is unresolved.

There's no tension that I see. While we do need to cater for different
target markets, we need to be very careful to maintain the very
special mix of community and commercial that Ubuntu has achieved.

Ubuntu is proving itself in thousands of different ways and, from what
I can see, is developing a reputation through word of mouth and
naturally ocurring PR (Canonical's PR department is virtually
non-existant and they don't hire an external agency, so any positive
press coverage arises because Ubuntu impresses people).

I feel we should be targetting different markets in subtle ways. We
should aim to support people's decision making process, when choosing
between Ubuntu and the alternatives, and so approach them in the way
they understand etc.

We don't want, though, to throw out the benefits of what we have
already by needlessly dividing the Ubuntu brand.

--
Matthew Revell
www.understated.co.uk

--
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing

Reply via email to