Jenda sent this just to me instead of the list.... On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:27:39 +0300, "Jenda Vancura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm not sure if I'd agree 100% on the Ubuntu Values part, but I do > think the proposal for restructuring the team makes sense. One thing > is, though that we've agreed before on the fact that the team needs no > overall leader/contact/advocate - but that projects need their own > leaders respectively. That would imply that the council would be made > up of project leaders. In that case, though, we would need some sort > of project approval process. Perhaps the existing council should be > enough to fulfill that task. > > Jenda (currently on vacation)
I would prefer the people-with-a-vote to be more than just the project leaders as there are a number of people who are doing a lot of work on the projects (and Rich has done a lot of work on the wiki etc.) who aren't project leaders. Unfortunately I can't think of a good way to identify those people without being completely arbitrary. Maybe we should just stick to project leaders (since this is a hopefully-will-never-matter issue anyway)? How we select "official" projects also has to be worked out. ________________________________________________________ Robert McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ormiret.com Growing old is inevitable, growing up optional. -- ubuntu-marketing mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
