On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:48 PM, John Vilsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for the vote of confidence! > > My recommendation is to base a quorum on attendance levels. I would use > tommorrow's attendance level as a baseline and then establish that 66% or > greater of that number are needed for votes at the next meeting. > > In the event of appointing a Core Marketing Group, I would say the same > level (2/3 or more) should be met to allow for the group to vote on any > motion. > > Hope that makes sense. If anyone has any better ideas please feel free! > > - John > > I dont know how to dissent without sounding like an ass. I certainly appreciate all the work you've apparently put into this. I cant help feeling like you certainly have accounted for a lot of chiefs. What about about the indians? We have guys in our team that do really good work. But they only have time to do maybe some web graphics here, some fliers there, some CD labels here ... you get the idea. In the past we've certainly taken collateral from the 'marketing team' and re-used it. We'll continue to do so...but I dont want to put barriers in front of these guys contributing just because they dont have the time to fight their way into the 'core marketing team'. dan
-- ubuntu-marketing mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
