On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:32:13PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: > Agreed. Delegating freeze decisions for a set of packages matches very much > what we've done with delegates so far :).
> motu-release chose the relevant delegates themselves. With "decisions in > terms > of freeze exceptions", I meant that not motu-release chooses delegates, but > any team can handle freeze exception requests for a given subset of packages > how the team think it's best. Of course this should include a responsibility > to ask the release-team in case of potentially contentious packages. That's precisely the model that I'm arguing against. If there are to be delegations here, they should be decided on a per-team basis, not as a blanket policy. So not "any team can handle" - only teams for which we identify delegates that we're confident are on the same page with the rest of the release team. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
