Hi, Am Thursday 18 February 2010 02:09:04 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:32:13PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: > > Agreed. Delegating freeze decisions for a set of packages matches very > > much what we've done with delegates so far :). > > > > motu-release chose the relevant delegates themselves. With "decisions in > > terms of freeze exceptions", I meant that not motu-release chooses > > delegates, but any team can handle freeze exception requests for a given > > subset of packages how the team think it's best. Of course this should > > include a responsibility to ask the release-team in case of potentially > > contentious packages. > > That's precisely the model that I'm arguing against. If there are to be > delegations here, they should be decided on a per-team basis, not as a > blanket policy. So not "any team can handle" - only teams for which we > identify delegates that we're confident are on the same page with the rest > of the release team.
Ok, was just an idea. Your proposal sounds good to me as well.
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
